On Friday, the BBC announced Gary Lineker would be stripped of presenting duties of Match of the Day until a position could be reached on his use of social media.
The decision was met with disillusion and uproar by many and plunging the BBC into what the NUJ described as “a crisis of its own making.”

Commenting on the widening impact on staff, freelance journalists and presenters and the forthcoming strike action by NUJ members across BBC Local, Michelle Stanistreet, NUJ general secretary, said:
“This whirling chaos is creating profound damage to the BBC’s reputation, something that is causing mounting concern and frustration amongst journalists across the corporation. Freelance and staff journalists and presenters at the BBC have been put in a stressful and invidious position this weekend, with no sign of this crisis abating.
“Many NUJ members have been asking the question this weekend – where is the Chairman? Not out there batting for the BBC and its reputation, that’s for sure. Richard Sharp has ducked for cover, because his own behaviour and poor conduct is part of the crisis facing the BBC. How can the Director General’s decision on Gary Lineker have any standing when the BBC’s own Chair is a major Tory donor and kept secret his role as £800,000 loan-fixer for the then-Prime Minister? His appointment by the select committee tasked with assessing his suitability for this important role has been tainted by this clear conflict of interest. The government’s own inquiry appears to be kicked into the long grass despite the government, not the BBC, being responsible for his appointment and continuing role. The same political figures who were demanding Gary Lineker’s scalp last week have stayed silent on Richard Sharp’s culpability.
“The handling of this has created a wholly unnecessary crisis. If assurances were given to Gary Lineker earlier in the week that this matter would all be resolved, yet come Friday he’s suspended – it seems highly likely that the external clamour and noise, much of it from those who are no friends of the BBC, led to that decision.
“Instead of this weekend’s news focussing on an issue of significant public interest – the government’s proposed Illegal Migration Bill – the spotlight is on a crisis of the BBC’s own making. This is a piece of legislation that has drawn legitimate concerns across our society, just today the Archbishop of York described the bill as “cruelty without purpose” and “immoral and inept”. The NUJ is one of over 350 organisations – unions, legal groups, charities, businesses – all coming together to register collective concerns over the impact this law could have on vulnerable people seeking safety. It should be possible for matters of human rights to be expressed and debated without them becoming sticks to beat the BBC with over its obligations on impartiality – responsibilities that journalists across the BBC’s news output strive to uphold on a daily basis.
“This is a moment to reflect on the role of our public service broadcaster and to remind ourselves that the BBC has to be able function free from political interference and meddling. Yet instead, it has seen its licence fee settlements exploited by successive Tory governments, leaving the BBC with additional financial obligations, including free licences for the over 75s and funding of the World Service, against a backdrop of political threats to scrap the licence fee and the critical principle of universality.
“BBC journalists care deeply about public service broadcasting and the Reithian principles that underpin the BBC. NUJ members working at BBC Local across England are taking industrial action on Wednesday and Thursday in a 24 hour strike that is about the future of quality local news in the many diverse communities the BBC serves. Plans to axe radio shows and reduce resources have caused dismay and anger amongst NUJ members who know the true value of trusted local news. The BBC’s much-vaunted Digital First strategy should not be implemented at the expense of news and content that is genuinely local and accessible. At the heart of these plans, there is a funding issue created by the government’s decision to freeze the licence fee, but it also lays bare a deeper question of what the BBC’s role and purpose is in a digital age. At a time of polarised debate, where high levels of distrust are cynically whipped up in echo chambers amplified by algorithms, a public service broadcaster like the BBC should be prized and protected, not hollowed out or left vulnerable to the whims of any government of the day.
“Rather than allow even more programme cuts and cancellations to kick in come 11am on Wednesday, the NUJ calls on the BBC to engage fully with the concerns of members who work across BBC Local, and come up with a workable compromise and sustainable solution.”
Discover more from Phil Mac Giolla Bháin
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Whilst I support the presenters and pundits during this little spat I can’t help but wonder where all the indignation and withdrawal of labour was during the World Cup, including the NUJ , that was held in a country that supports slave labour and you can get punished severely just for being gas.
Also, the very thought that the BBC is impartial is hilarious.
The BBC are just the Right Wing Propaganda Machine for Westminster.
The BBC is selective about being impartial.
The NUJ is selective about protecting free speech.
Many people don’t watch the BBC or buy/subscribe to newspapers.
As you get older and wiser – and more cynical ? –
you start to question whether there really is free speech in the UK,
… whether the UK has ever been a democracy?
The bbc dont do impartiality, it’s yoon drivel hyperbole, fomented with right wing jingoism and sadistic imperialism
I’m sure Jim Spence is wondering where was all this solidarity when he got pumped from the BBC for telling truth about sevco.
Black lives matter as much as anyone but I feared the eponymous organization chose the wrong “hero” to highlight their cause and alienated many. and fear the anti-fascist brigade have made a similar mistake in chosen Lineker’s cause.
English is my first language just in case anyone was in doubt…
Anti-Fascist Brigade ? Your sash is showing, Billy.
Referring to an entity rather than a concept.
Excellent statement by the NUJ
I didn’t see any requests for strikes or articles when Matt Le Tissier was sacked for simply asking questions about young footballers collapsing and dying. Then again it went against the bs narrative of which you were all part of.
Well said that man.
Even the slightest questioning of the V is strictly verboten, as Matt Le Tissier proved.
Lineker’s exuberant salary is obscene in itself. Especially given the current cost of living crisis. There’s a number of reason such individuals won’t vocally support Julian Assange. The prisoner in Belmarsh was highlighting war crimes, and causing embarrassment to military elites. Anyone that thinks Gary Lineker OBE is anti establishment-must be deluded.
He may not be anti establishment but he is anti fascist, and at a time the hard right in the Tory Party are taking us towards Fascism with their Anti refugees and anti trade union bills going through parliament, every democrat must do everything they can to highlight this attack on the poor and vulnerable.
The unfair first past the post voting system in Britain leaves it particularly vulnerable to extreme minorities taking over the government. This Tory government has never had the support of much more than 40% of the electorate for the 13 years they have been in power, yet look at the damage they have done to the country. They are a corrupt and dishonest party, right to the core.
Think you may have missed the whole point. Lineker accepted his gong from a racist leaning royal institution. He doesn’t fool everyone.
Nobody is disputing what the Tories are. It’s pretty evident.