The Outlaw King

Regular readers will not be surprised at this most recent development at Sevco.

 

The Johannesburg based convicted criminal has been energetically briefing against the current regime in the Blue Room for some time now.

This is just the most recent chapter in that campaign.

Moreover, if you do not follow follow the money, then his conduct is baffling.

I think it is fair to say that it has perplexed some of the Ibrox klanbase.

There is something of a dilemma here for the Sevco High Command.

Do they want Mr King inside the Blue Room pissing out, or outside it pissing in?

Of course, all that Dave wants is for some staunch person to purchase his RIFC shares.

After that, he will simply piss off.


Discover more from Phil Mac Giolla Bháin

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

38 thoughts on “The Outlaw King”

  1. Nice sentiments Effarr but I don’t think he’s here for the football or a rational conversation about the subject matter.
    It has been said that It is good and honourable to serve one’s country but that’s provided that you do so in both a good and honourable manner (also within the laws of the Geneva Convention).
    Which sadly some who chose to Serve didn’t or aren’t.

    Hell mend them.

    The vast majority who choose to serve their Country meanwhile have a clear conscience.

    Reply
    • ‘It has been said that it’s good and honourable to serve one’s country’ you say but just because something has been said does NOT make it true, Duncan.

      In the same way that just because something’s written down doesn’t make it true either, and most certainly not in the Freemasonic bible as written by the notorious Freemasonic pederast King James which you have quoted from here.

      Now if you were God do you think that you would choose such a man to edit’, ie, CENSOR your book for you?

      Reply
  2. _Paddy Grimbolt

    What or who gives you authority to decide whether someone should or should not believe in God? You are welcome, and it should be acknowledged, to have a right not to believe but please don`t start grassing on someone who may just be correct in their beliefs. What about a person`s basic right to think for themselves, especially when they would have more ammunition in their armoury (pardon the pun) than you might have in a discussion.

    Maybe it`s a good job that there were believers in the occupying forces in Ireland as I really don`t think anyone believing in God would have carried out the callous, Miami Showband murders for example.

    Personally, I think it is a lot easier to believe in God than not to believe when you consider the wonders of the world, the oxygen, the gravity or, as the song says, when you hear a new born baby cry, touch a leaf or see the sky.

    It would be more relaxing to try and talk about the game last night and stay away from these type of
    contentious issues. Just give it a try.

    ____

    Reply
    • Oh, I don’t believe in Creation nor the existence of God, Effar, as we don’t need belief when we have Knowledge and I have the full knowledge and see with my own two eyes the true wonder of God’s Great Creation around me every moment of every day,

      However the British Squaddie who believes that the vast majority of British soldiers’ ‘conscience is clear’ is another matter entirely, for the simple reason that even though he calls himself a Creationist he doesn’t actually believe in Creation at all!

      In the same way that he’ll in the same breath tell you that he wasn’t really a British soldier at all as he didn’t quite say all the words in the oath to the queen in his induction ceremony, apparently because he’s a Celtic supporter and doesn’t really like the queen, even though he wore her Army’s uniform with her crown on it as he patrolled the streets of Ireland carrying at least one of her Army’s weapons.

      As for most British soldiers having a ‘clear conscience’, given what we know of their bloodthirsty history worldwide, their tying Sikhs to the front of cannons in India to the terrible atrocities carried out by the Black & Tans across Ireland, well, I think these words of this Creationist who’s not a Creationist and soldier who wasn’t really a soldier tells you precisely what kind of hypocrite if not liar of a man we’re actually dealing with here.

      Reply
      • That’s a very long and tedious conversation we had elsewhere.
        Conversing with a troll is the equivalent of doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
        Let’s hope and pray 🙏🏼 you don’t trash these pages and this site anywhere near as much as you have the other you frequent as I very much doubt Phil has the same patience for your inane ramblings as they do.
        We’re done move along Dee Dee yer bus is about to leave Yoker for Renton.
        Say hi to John James when ye get back tae the state funded bedsit/ safehoose 🤪👍🏼

        Tin foil helmet on ready for lift off …🚀

        Adios 👋🏼

        Reply
  3. Do you know there’s an actual Creationist on this page, Phil?

    A regular contributor of yours?

    A former self proclaimed member of the British Squadron in Ireland too?

    Now whether he’s a REAL ‘Creationist’ in the UDA sense of ‘600 years’ or just a fake Creationist, as in ‘The Denial of Creation Itself’, is for him to declare but why don’t you ask him so you at least know the truth of it for yourself and by yourself?

    Either way, he says he’s a Creationist and I think such bold claims without evidence should be questioned don’t you?

    Reply
    • Creation is all around us Paddy… just look at the array of beautiful flowers we have or study the complexity of the human eye. Similarly, if your maw is wearing knickers today then it would be ludicrous of me to suggest that they just appeared out of thin air. Even more so then the aforementioned examples which are far more complicated by design. “By design” being the operative words.

      Reply
      • Well, Danielle, this ‘Creationist’ on here believes, like Phil, that the Earth is actually a ball spinning at millions of miles an hour in a vacuum when nothing can exist in a vacuum.

        Furthermore he believes that this ball in a vacuum is travelling however many millions through this vacuum every day even though the fact that the star constellations above our created Earth unchangingly repeat the exact same patterns year after, aeon after aeon, millennia after millennia.

        Of course they travel together across the sky in a process called Celestial Drift but on the Winter Solstice of each year the constellations return to their original positions and continue their annual procession across God’s mighty Heavens.

        Yet this so called ‘Creationist’ who denies Creation denies this, even though centuries old star charts as used by mariners prove that the stars have remained unchanging throughout recorded history.

        Quite the conundrum for both atheists and Creationists who are not really Creationists at all, don’t you think?

        Indeed for anyone who believes they live on a spinning ball travelling millions of miles per day through a vacuum?

        Reply
  4. Does King really want this, or is it a ruse?
    Have Ashley /Elite/ Hummell been compensated yet? I remember figures in excess of £10m being mentioned. I genuinely have lost track.

    Reply
  5. To pee or not to pee That is the question—Whether ’tis stauncher in the mind to suffer The Kings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, And, by opposing, end them?” The idea of whether is it better to live or to die …….again.
    Of course it would have been better to study the history of King than decipher Hamlet if one was considering getting into bed with him (in a business sense of course) If they had they would have listened to the wise words of Judge Southwood who labelled him glib and shameless they may also have taken note of the charges that were originally set against him . Intimidation of witnesses , falsifying documentation , destruction of evidence and over 200 others. With a track record like that it’s a wonder Boris Johnson hasn’t offered him a peerage.
    As a business they need this cold shouldered hindrance gone for good if they are ever to attract proper investment and normalised lines of credit . As the largest shareholder even without his seat on the board he remains a person with significant control . The cost of getting rid of him just increased when they raised the price of shares from 20p to 25p to give the illusion of stability .
    All we need now is Mike Ashley to turn up with his credit note for a full house,
    Welkom back Dave , we’ve missed you.

    Reply
    • That £20m was lost in the same time period he was diverting R200m from the South African Tax man.
      So it could be argued it wasn’t even his money to gamble and lose in the first place 🤷🏻‍♂️

      Reply
          • Your YouTube video is unavailable and you forget to mention that Genesis also tells us that God made the Earth SOLID & IMMOVABLE on FOUR PILLARS, one for each corner of His immovable Earth, with a solid Firmament ‘like molten glass over it’ to separate the waters above from the waters below, ie, on Earth.

            Yet you have argued elsewhere that this part of Genesis is somehow irrelevant and that the Earth is, in fact, spinning at millions of miles an hour through a vacuum.

            So which is it?

            We live on a spinning ball in a vacuum or we live on God’s level immovable Earth protected by an unbreakable fIrmament?

        • The Big Bang and suddenly Mrs Grimbolt is wearing her finest silk… to be removed at a later date in the creation of young Paddy.

          Reply
          • Danielle Steel?

            Like the lady author who writes pulp novels for middle aged angst ridden women?

            Is this where you get your name from dear?

            A trashy female novelist?

            How apt!

        • haha Stewart Lee is very funny. Let me back to you later so as to provide you with a satisfactory answer. Worth mentioning too that the 7 Days of Creation are not literal days. If we refer to such terms as “A day for a year” as per bible prophecy and “In the day of.”

          “For a thousand years are in your eyes just as yesterday when it is past,
          Just as a watch during the night.”

          Reply
          • Edit: The earth and the universe existed before the six days of creation. I’m sure you knew what I meant when I said 7 days (including a wee rest).

        • I seem to be having a conversation with you without your knowledge haha I replied to Duncan’s post mistaking it for yours… anyway, the earth and the universe existed before the six days of creation.

          Reply
          • I’m just humouring the guy.
            He’s not in here for the rational discussions he’s here to cause his own wee big bang.

            More of a damp squib in reality.

            Ps shoulda checked that video link before posting it’s been cut short the routine ends with the Big Bang.
            My bad and apologies to Mr Lee a very funny man.

            And now I move on back to the subject of Dave King and his lost £20m under Murray.
            Which is if you hadn’t noticed was the subject matter I was replying to in the first place.
            Faith is a personal subject between an individual and God.

          • Danielle Steel, you’re seriously saying that The Earth and the universe existed BEFORE Creation?

            In that case, who made them and what proof do you have for this absurd claim?

            How could the Earth exist BEFORE it was created?

          • And while you’re at it please do explain how anything can exist in a vacuum, far less a vacuum at the power of 1×10-17 Torr, which is claimed by science to be the power of the vacuum which we live in, along with all the other alleged galaxies, stars, suns and cosmos’ in the universe.

            You know, the vacuum where nothing can exit. Except all that stuff …

            We can’t even get combustion nor thrust in a regular little lab vacuum so how do you think a ‘gas giant’ like Jupiter can exist in such a massive vacuum as ‘infinite space’?

            Explain this separately from what will no doubt be an hilarious attempt at explaining your utterly lunatic claim that Earth existed before it existed …

            I eagerly look forward to your responses.

          • “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.”—Genesis 1:1.

            The earth and the universe existed before man Paddy. That’s not difficult to comprehend. I didn’t say: “The earth existed before it existed.” lol

            God created the universe, including the earth, in the indefinite past—“in the beginning,” as Genesis 1:1 says. Modern science agrees that the universe had a beginning. A recent scientific model suggests it to be almost 14 billion years old.

            The Bible also describes six “days” of creation. However, it does not say that these were 24-hour days. (Genesis 1:31) In fact, the Bible uses the word “day” to refer to various lengths of time. For example, it calls the entire period of creation “the day that Jehovah God made earth and heaven.” (Genesis 2:4) Evidently, these “days” of creation lasted many thousands of years.—Psalm 90:4.

            For a thousand years are in your eyes just as yesterday when it is past,
            Just as a watch during the night.

            I have included God’s name as it occurs some 7000 times throughout the original-language text of the Bible.

            I’m happy to discuss this with you in a polite and cordial manner should you be so inclined to do likewise. Perhaps we can have a wee laugh in the process and who knows, we might become friends. It’s a very important subject because we all want to know how we came to exist and just as important what the future holds for us.

          • Come come now, Danielle, you explicitly wrote ‘The Earth & the universe existed before Creation’.

            It’s right here for all to see on the page.

            Ow perhaps we can discuss this cordially and we might well become friends but first you’ll have to explain what you think Creation is as it is NOT simply the Creation of Humanity but the Creation of Heaven & Earth we are discussing.

            But again we cannot go by the false words of Freemasonic Bible to establish such things so I’d be very interested indeed where you get this idea that exam day isn’t actually a day at all but thousands of years at a time …

            Where’d did you get this idea from?

            And by what measure do you hold it to be true?

            Have you attempted any actual tests to make such a claim beyond all doubt?

            Or are you simply repeating someone else’s idea without even thinking about it as it appears?

            For if you wish to know the origins of humanity, my friend, you must first understand what God has put in the sky to tell us conclusively that we DO NOT live on a spinning ball flying through a vacuum at millions of miles an hour, which both debunks the lies of mainstream ‘science’ and what our Creationist/Non Creationist friend Duncan here believes.

            For the star constellations unchangingly repeat their annual celestial drift year after year
            and it requires a skilled mind to understand that through this observable, measurable, testable and repeatable fact that mainstream ‘science’ have been lying to us all along.

            And the way to the truth of this matter is right above our heads in the God Created calendar clock of the constellations themselves.

            But you explain your statements first then we’ll cover this part later.

            Cheers.

          • haha You’re a funny man Paddy. OK

            1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

            It then goes on to say:

            2 Now the earth was formless and desolate, and there was darkness upon the surface of the watery deep, and God’s active force was moving about over the surface of the waters
            3 And God said: “Let there be light.” Then there was light. 4 After that God saw that the light was good, and God began to divide the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light Day, but the darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, a first day.

            And so on ending with a second, third, 4th, 5th and 6th day.

            Thus the heavens and the earth and everything in them were completed. 2 And by the seventh day, God had completed the work that he had been doing, and he began to rest on the seventh day from all his work that he had been doing.

            btw I don’t go by as you describe, the “Freemasonic Bible. Although I think it is good to cross reference different translations because it helps us establish that there is no such place as “hell” for example.

            One of the contradictions is that Jesus must have been in hell for three days if we translate the words Hades, Sheol and Gehenna as meaning hell i.e. a place of everlasting torment. Those words refer to the grave and Gehenna is everlasting destruction. It is noteworthy to recall that Jesus indicated that some of the hypocritical religious leaders in his day would go to Gehenna.​

            The irony here I’m sure is not lost on you that those who preach such lies are destined to go to Gehenna themselves.—Matthew 23:27-​33.

            31 Therefore, you are testifying against yourselves that you are sons of those who murdered the prophets. 32 Well, then, fill up the measure of your forefathers.
            33 “Serpents, offspring of vipers,g how will you flee from the judgment of Ge·henʹna?

            I’ll address your other points as best I can Paddy. I should note that regardless of what I don’t understand my purpose in life is to try my best to follow Jesus’ teachings and do so everyday as best I can. A lot easier said than done but that’s what I strive to do.

          • I hope Phil doesn’t mind this, in fact I hope he finds it interesting and I hope too it helps give you further insight Paddy:

            “DAY” IN THE SCRIPTURES

            Clearly this ever-living Creator, Jehovah God, would view time differently from the way we mere mortals do, with our lifespan of seventy or eighty years. Does not a young child view time differently from the way a person well along in years views it? To a child twelve months might seem to be a very long time, but to an elderly person the years just seem to fly by. How much differently, then, must the “Ancient of Days” view time from the way we mortals do! Obviously, when Jehovah in his Word speaks of a “day” or “days,” we should not conclude that he always means days of twenty-four hours. He may be referring to such and he may not.

            Thus we find that the Hebrew word for “day,” yohm, is used in a variety of ways in the Bible. In the very account of creation we have “day” used to refer to three different periods of time. “Day” is used to refer to the daylight hours, as when we read: “God began calling the light Day, but the darkness he called Night.” It is used to refer to both day and night, as when we read: “There came to be evening and there came to be morning, a first day.” And “day” is also used to refer to the entire time period involved in creation of the heavens and the earth: “This is a history of the heavens and the earth in the time of their being created, in the day that Jehovah God made earth and heaven.”​—Gen. 1:5; 2:4.

            Then again, on more than one occasion Jehovah God used a day to represent a year. This he did in connection with the Israelites in the wilderness and with his prophet Ezekiel. His Word says: “A day for a year, a day for a year, you will answer for your errors.” “A day for a year, a day for a year, is what I have given you.” (Num. 14:34; Ezek. 4:6) Likewise in regard to Daniel’s prophecy that foretold the coming of the Messiah at the end of sixty-nine “weeks.” The Messiah came, not at the end of sixty-nine literal weeks, or 483 days, but at the end of 483 years.

            Not only one year, but even a thousand years are at times represented as one day in God’s Word. As the prophet Moses mused: “For a thousand years are in your eyes but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch during the night.” The apostle Peter expresses it even stronger: “Let this one fact not be escaping your notice, beloved ones, that one day [Greek, he·meʹra] is with Jehovah as a thousand years and a thousand years as one day.”​—Ps. 90:4; 2 Pet. 3:8.

            Yes, in the Christian Greek Scriptures “day” is also used to refer to other periods of time, not just to twenty-four hours. For example, Jesus on one occasion said: “Abraham your father rejoiced greatly in the prospect of seeing my day, and he saw it and rejoiced.” Likewise we read of such expressions by his followers as “Christ’s day,” “Jehovah’s day,” and “the great day of God the Almighty.” Surely none of these are meant to be limited to just twenty-four hours. (John 8:56; Phil. 2:16; 1 Thess. 5:2; Rev. 16:14) The foregoing makes it clear that a “day” from God’s viewpoint is not necessarily limited to twenty-four hours.

          • It was prophecy above and now It has begun… 😉👍🏼
            I sincerely hope that you are no longer heavily involved in finishing or starting a book Phil as your workload in here is about to become very heavy indeed.
            A quick trip to ETims should confirm that these pages are soon to be filled with all sorts of spurious non topic related guff from their resident space cadet.

            May the almighty give you endless patience Phil 🙏🏼

  6. What a dilemma for the blue room. Possibly part of the dilemma is that buying confetti shares puts bawbees into the clumpany. Buying the Lying King’s shares doesn’t. It puts bawbees into HIS pockets that may, no probably WILL, be required down the line…….to buy confetti shares. SO fuckin complicated!!!

    Reply
    • Maybe I’m missing the point, but surely King’s cold shoulder is still in place? Wouldn’t that preclude him from rejoining the board? Is young Mr Jack being taken for a fool again?

      Reply
      • Well spotted that man!

        With all the BS floating around Ibrox, it is quite easy to overlook the significant fact that the ex-RIFC Chairman was the recipient of a relatively rare “cold shoulder” from the City! And yes, as far as we are aware, that has not been revoked.

        All King can do is snipe from the sidelines through his SMSM poodles.

        I suppose he could noise up the Blue Rom by threatening to put forward another person to join the Board,

        [but he would also – honestly and staunchly – deny he would be a Shadow Director of course!]

        Fun times ahead… 🙂

        Reply

Leave a Reply

error: Content is protected !!